Comparison of ABI and IIT
Automated Ball IndentationTM (ABI) Instrumented Indentation Test (IIT) or depth-sensing indentation / nanoindentation
Computer Control Automated - computer-controlled motion is mandatory for intermediate partial unloadings, continuous load-depth sensing (1) (2) Instrumented - instrumented does not equal automated
continuous depth-sensing
Load Range (F) Macroscopic (2N ≤ F ≤ 5000 N) Ultra-low load, nanoindentation (0.05 N≤ F ≤0.50 N) (4) (5)
Depth Range (h) 40μm ≤ h ≤ 400 μm Nano range: h ≤ 0.2 μm (4) (5)
Indenter Geometry Ball (≥250μm) Pyramidal Berkovich, (4) (5)
Small ball indenter (<50μm) rarely used due to unacceptable geometry
Load/Displacement Shape Linear Curve
Partial Unloading Technique Yes (1) (2) No
Indent Measurement Analytical Analytical and optical
Calibration Load cell calibrated per ASTM E4 and E74
LVDT calibrated with traceable micrometer
No calibration blocks exist for Martens hardness or indentation modulus
Vibration Table Required No Yes
Load Frame Springs N/A Yes
True-Stress vs True-Plastic-Strain Curve Comparable to Conventional Tension Test Yes
Nondestructive (1) (2)
No
Yield Strength Yes
Nondestructive (1) (2)
No
Strain-Hardening Exponent (n) (uniform ductility) Yes
Nondestructive (1) (2)
No
Strength Coefficient (K) Yes
Nondestructive (1) (2)
No
Precision Values Yes, complete 6-lab ILS per ASTM E691, ILS report submitted to ASTM E28 Limited 1-lab, 1-machine (nano range), Berkovich indenter. No demonstrated inter-laboratory precision values. Machine was not verified and no calibration blocks used.
Fracture Toughness of Metals - Haggag Toughness Method (HTM) Yes, nondestructive
Determined from ball indentation deformation energy of metallic materials
No
Elastic Modulus Yes,
Nondestructive (2)
Indentation Modulus (3)
* Indentation Modulus may or may not correlate to elastic modulus
Hardness ABI Hardness Yes - Martens Hardness from quasi-destructive pyramidal Berkovich indenter.
Martens hardness cannot be obtained from spherical indenter (3)
Thin Films N/A Yes
Tribological Behavior N/A Yes
Ceramics N/A Yes

REFERENCES

1. Haggag, F. M., “Field Indentation Microprobe for Structural Integrity Evaluation,” U.S. Patent No. 4,852,397, August 1, 1989.

2. Haggag, F. M. "Use of Automated Ball Indentation Testing to Measure Flow Properties and Estimate Fracture Toughness in Metallic Materials," ASTM STP 1092, 1990, pp. 188-208.

3. “Metallic materials – Instrumented indentation test for hardness and materials parameters,” ISO14577-1, 2, 3, 2002.

4. Hay, J. L. and G. M. Pharr, “Instrumented Indentation Testing,” eds. Howard Kuhn and Dana Medlin, ASM Handbook, Vol. 8, 2000.

5. Van Landingham, Mark, “Review of Instrumented Indentation,” Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Vol 108, No. 4, July-August 2003, pp. 249-265.